Construction Site Accident Attorney in Big Rock

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re seeking stellar legal representation following a construction site accident in Big Rock, Illinois, the dynamic team at Carlson Bier stands ready. As experts in personal injury law with an enviable track record of success, our considerable capability brings assurance to injured parties navigating the often overwhelming legal landscape post-accident. Our deep understanding of Construction Site Accident Law ensures we navigate every angle relevant to your case and work diligently for optimal results. The unwavering mission on which we operate is justice for clients through compensation commensurate to your loss during a damaging occurrence at a worksite – be it measurable monetary loss or incalculable emotional tumult due to the incident. We ensure exceptional attention given to each distinct case and relentlessly advocate within terms of legality aiming towards securing rightful compensation. Choose Carlson Bier when dealing with complex negotiations pertinent to construction site accidents; trust us as you place faith in an empathetic companion prioritizing your best interest throughout this traumatic period.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Big Rock Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a league of seasoned personal injury attorneys focused on championing the rights of individuals who have suffered due to construction site accidents. Illinois law keeps tenants at heart by promoting their welfare and preoccupying employers with stringent safety measures. Even so, unfortunate cases arise where workers and even pedestrians fall victim to unexpected mishaps in construction areas. It’s at such times that the legal team at Carlson Bier steps in—determinedly pursuing justice and rightful compensation for our clients.

Construction site accidents may occur as a result of various factors including but not limited to improvised safety precautions, faulty equipment, poor worker training, or lack of supervision leading to serious injuries like broken bones, burns, traumatic brain injuries or sometimes even fatality. Whether as an employee injured at work or a passerby hit by falling materials within such confines, you may be eligible for compensation under the Illinois State Law.

In determining if your case qualifies for litigation or compensation claim,

• We consider whether the duty owed to you was breached.

• The existing causal link between the ineptitude and your consequential harm needs analysis.

• Competency of appropriate damages matching severity of experienced loss must be evaluated.

Filing this lawsuit promptly is a valuable step; usually within two years from when the accident occurred under the Statute of limitations guideline. Our renowned attorneys exhibit expertise in preparing these claims – collecting relevant evidence from medical records & eyewitness accounts plus assessing economic implications based on the level of damage inflicted upon income-earning potential tied up with incurred medical fees.

By retaining our services today on your side against insurance providers reluctant in fulfilling their promises amidst bureaucratic maneuvers employed by compensations boards – never again will you feel alone. Here at Carlson Bier – our client’s interests crown every operation!

Understanding nuances ascribed under each law governing Construction Site Accident Lawsuits requires proficient lawyers— A task mastered adequately by us after years dedicated through serving victims caught within similar circumstances.

• Workers compensation covers injuries sustained at work – excluding third party claims.

• Third-party claims, otherwise known as independent lawsuits provide compensation exclusive of workers’ insurance. State law subjects the defendant to pay for any negligence-induced harm. Notably though still maintains a valid ground for filing if verified that such negligence formed part of the action resulting in an injury.

• Premises liability shields from injury caused due to hazardous conditions as you undertake tasks around your premises plus any other duty-bound location.

Remembering these laws may seem complicated; although together with us – nothing stays out of reach!

Choosing a reliable advocate is vital when dealing with personal injury cases especially those inclined towards construction accidents under Illinoian Laws setting Carlson Bier apart as one outstanding and resourceful option.

Why trust our team?

• Proven Track Record: We have previously helped numerous clients secure befitting compensations hence affirming our capability in managing even more complex suits.

• Expertly Skilled: Our attorneys unwavering dedication continues to fuel the pursuit of justice lightened through knowledge-based practice ideals.

• Client-Centered: We stand by each victim relentlessly ensuring all rights are accounted for until victory gets proclaimed.

In summary, no struggle should go unvoiced or unpaid! Regardless of whether you’re an employee or a bystander, Carlson Bier is committed to defending the rights of victims suffering from construction site accidents across Illinois. Combining years of experience backed up by satisfied clients’ testimonials – we assure optimal legal representation suited specially for your case.

Pondering about your case worth? Each claim contains value unique from others due to variances distinguishing client backgrounds/expenses propelled by varied accident impacts/injuries/scenarios creating undeniable uniqueness respectively. Endure no longer in doubt preferring instead to unveil this pertinent question’s solution right away! Take control now and click below – Let’s guess no more over how much your case might be worth! From here, we win together. All you need to do is claim it.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Big Rock Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Big Rock

Areas of Practice in Big Rock

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Offering specialist legal help for patients of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring expert legal advice for clients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Accountability

Handling cases involving problematic products, extending specialist legal services to consumers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Slip Mishaps

Skilled in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking compensation for their losses.

Birth Harms

Extending legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Accidents: Committed to guiding sufferers of car accidents gain just recompense for harms and destruction.

Motorcycle Incidents

Expert in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Big Rig Incident

Ensuring specialist legal advice for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for harms.

Construction Collisions

Engaged in advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to providing specialized legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for people who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Neural Trauma

Dedicated to representing clients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer