FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Chester

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unfortunate accidents occur at construction sites in Chester, the law firm of Carlson Bier stands prepared to advocate for those affected. With years of experience and a primary focus on personal injury law, Carlson Bier offers robust legal representation specifically tailored for Construction Site Accident cases. A testimony to their prowess lies in their numerous successfully resolved cases which affirm their proficiency and dedications. Defending laborers within volatile construction environments is not new terrain for us; ensuring maximum compensation constitutes our driving force. Accidents tend to have far-reaching implications – both physically as well as finances can take a hit – count on Carlson Bier who take every nuance into account while fighting your case! Whether it’s negligent safety practices or faulty equipment causing affliction, we excel in identifying liability and pursuing justice relentlessly. Therefore, you needn’t settle with insurance lowball offers or suffer due bills silently – reach out today to Carlson Bier—the undeniable choice when seeking diligent legal counsel following construction site accidents!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Chester Illinois

Welcome to the Carlson Bier law firm, your trusted partner during challenging times. Our winning team of personal injury attorneys takes pride in serving and safeguarding the rights of those impacted by construction site accidents throughout Illinois.

As specialists in this complex area, we bring years of experience and a robust understanding of all aspects related to construction site accidents. These unfortunate incidents can occur due to multiple reasons:

– Unsafe work environments or practices

– Faulty machinery or equipment

– Lack of or inadequate safety gear

-Collapses such as scaffolding failure

– Falling from heights like roofs, ladders, or cranes

Each situation is unique, requiring personalized attention and legal strategy which our dedicated team is committed to providing.

It’s crucial for accident victims to be aware that workplace injuries are not only physically burdensome but financially draining as well through medical bills, rehabilitation costs, lost income due to being unable to perform duties on-site – even with insurance benefits considered. Fortunately, legislation exists within the State of Illinois ensuring that accident victims receive just compensation provided they pursue their claims appropriately.

Our role at Carlson Bier is multifaceted; firstly we help clients understand their legal rights following an accident. Secondly, we guide them through complexities surrounding Worker’s Compensation Act & liability laws related to third-party negligence (these may apply when someone other than your employer is at fault). We then scrutinize various facts surrounding your case: type and severity of injuries sustained, potential Safety Acts violated leading up-to-the incident among others—ultimately building a solid lawsuit optimized for courtroom success or significant settlements negotiation out-of-court.

At Carlson Bier, we maintain extraordinary empathy for our clients who are typically battling physical pain while navigating their way towards financial reassurance post-accident. Our promise is tireless dedication until fair compensation reflecting both economic (medical costs & lost wages) and non-economic damages (pain and suffering), has been attained.

Moreover, our ethos of placing client welfare over profit ensures we operate on a contingency fee basis; meaning, you only pay us once your case is successfully settled.

We offer complimentary consultation as well, granting potential clients easy access to expert counsel without financial constraints influencing the decision to seek justice.

Time sensitivity is another essential aspect victims need to be aware of post-accident. In Illinois typically has a statute of limitations (i.e., deadline to file lawsuit) for personal injury cases, thus swift action following an accident is advisable. Our law firm is capable and ready to expedite proceedings preserving critical evidence and testimonies which may otherwise be lost with passage of time.

All said and done, no amount of compensation can undo physical discomfort or emotional distress following construction site accidents. However, regaining some semblance of normalcy—peacefully healing from serious bodily harm while remaining financially secure—is truly possible with Carlson Bier by your side with our deep-rooted commitment towards diligent legal representation upholding victim rights above all else.

Remember, it’s more than your right—it’s your responsibility—to stand against negligence causing such painful disruptions in life. Allow us at CarlsonBier to assist during this journey restoring justice through lackluster chaos inflicted by workplace accidents.

Lastly, ascertain how much your case could potentially fetch in terms of reimbursement using our unique claims assessment tool available just a click away below! Despite enduring tough times presently remember ‘justice served’ awaits at the end of this tumultuous tunnel making every effort worthwhile—and we’re here ensuring you reach there victoriously! Click below now and find out how much your case might worth – absolutely free!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chester Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Chester

Areas of Practice in Chester

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Burns

Supplying expert legal assistance for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering experienced legal services for clients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Handling cases involving defective products, offering skilled legal support to individuals affected by harmful products.

Aged Neglect

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Fall Occurrences

Specialist in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Extending legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Incidents: Committed to helping individuals of car accidents receive reasonable remuneration for injuries and harm.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering adept legal support for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for hurts.

Worksite Crashes

Focused on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Brain Damages

Specializing in ensuring compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in managing cases for people who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Specializing in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and adept legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Neural Injury

Expert in advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440