FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Golden

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a construction site accident can be daunting and life-altering. Amidst the turmoil, Carlson Bier is your dependable ally across Illinois, including Golden, seeking justice by providing aggressive legal representation for those harmed due to others’ negligence. Their top-notch attorney team specializes in personal injury law with noteworthy mastery in representing victims of construction site accidents. Leveraging their knowledge about intricate workers’ compensation laws and Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (OSHA), they are adept at unfolding the complex layers involved in such claims. Whether you’re grappling with employer liability issues or confronting insurance companies refusing fair settlements, Carlson Bier’s lawyers stand strong to protect your rights relentlessly. Their commendable track record shows why choosing them not only brings exemplary professional expertise but also compassionate guidance during challenging times of distress. Don’t let overwhelming legalities cloud your path to recovery; trust into unparalleled dedication of Carlson Bier− helping injured individuals rise above adversity every day while reasserting their lives lost amidst workplace hazards.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Golden Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we have built a reputable track record as dedicated personal injury attorneys majored in handling Construction Site Accident cases in Illinois. We recognize the potential hazards and dangers related to construction sites ranging from falling materials, slips or falls from scaffolding, electrocution injuries, equipment malfunction, and exposure to hazardous substances which can lead to debilitating injuries.

Understanding the intricate nature of construction site accidents demands an exceptional level of legal acumen. Our experienced team at Carlson Bier has vast knowledge about Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) regulations along with state laws governing construction site safety. Therefore, we harness our resources in helping our clients navigate through complex litigation processes after a tragic event on a construction site.

• Deadly machinery: Heavy machinery often used at sites poses considerable risk if not properly maintained or operated.

• Investigation: In order to determine the responsible parties for an accident at a contruction site, extensive investigations are necessary.

• Multiple culpable parties: There could be multiple potentially liable parties including general contractors, sub-contractors among others.

• Workers’ Compensation Laws: These laws cover certain laborers and provide for their medical payments and wage loss compensation. However you might still need our services since Worker’s compensation benefits do not always offer adequate relief needed for recovery back to normal health and life routine

Carlson Bier’s objective is emphasizing both compassion and competency while representing your interests. We engage intensively with every case brought forth – investigating all possible causative aspects of negligent management or maintenance that may have precipitated the ill-fated incident.

Moreover, we firmly believe that no victim should bear the consequence of another party’s negligence alone; from lost wages due to inability to work resulting from injury sustained at construction site accident along with incurred hefty healthcare bills or even unfortunate instances leading to wrongful death claims along unjust trauma inflicted on surviving family members – each demanding justice being served.

Striving diligently for our clients so as to aim at obtaining the rightful compensation required for medical bills, lost wages and other key essentials that dramatically affect victims of construction site accidents remains our ultimate endeavor. We tirelessly work towards bridging financial gaps inflicted by these hardships while rendering emotional support enabling our clients regain a sense of normalcy.

Reaching out to Carlson Bier can indeed be an initial step in securing your path towards recovery in the aftermath of experiencing such an unfortunate event. Entrust us with your journey towards justice; be enlightened on the full scope of your rights as an accident victim, help you through intricate processes involved in filing for claims along with offering you representation against corporations, their legal teams along with insurance entities maneuvering so as to reduce or dismiss culpability.

We regard each case we handle at Carlson Bier with utmost reverence it deserves hence blending professionalism enhanced by our analytical skills natured over time serving multiple clients who have experienced similar predicaments coupled up with capacity to leverage not only laws applicable within Illinois but also federal regulations.

To fully comprehend how much your personally endured challenges resulting from a construction accident might translate into monetary merit legally recognized under Illinois law plus ensuring your case captures all potentially responsible parties beyond attracting just deserved compensation…

Allow skilled team from Carlson Bier steer your course through this disheartening ordeal- Click on the button below today. Find out what your unique case is worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Golden Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Golden

Areas of Practice in Golden

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying specialist legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Medical Negligence

Offering experienced legal support for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Trip Incidents

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Car Crashes

Crashes: Focused on guiding victims of car accidents gain appropriate payout for harms and harm.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Committed to providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Semi Crash

Ensuring adept legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for hurts.

Construction Collisions

Concentrated on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Injuries

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Passing

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and experienced legal services to ensure justice.

Vertebral Injury

Committed to supporting patients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440