FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Marseilles

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re dealing with a construction site accident, every second counts. That’s where Carlson Bier, a sterling personal injury lawyer firm comes in. With extensive knowledge of Illinois Construction Site Accident law and a track record for fighting tirelessly for maximum compensation on behalf of their clients, Carlson Bier is your best defense against an inadequate settlement. They know that accidents can be split-second moments that change lives forever; thus they respond quickly and efficiently ensuring the ball stays rolling toward resolution at all times. This legal powerhouse stands up confidently to insurance companies or negligent employers who attempt to downplay or dismiss claims unduly which has made them win laurels in aggressive negotiation and sharp litigation abilities in courtrooms statewide including Marseilles proving it time after time why any victims of Construction Site Accidents should consider utilizing their services. When seeking justice feels like building without blueprints, trust only reliable option – it’s not just another case when you choose Carlson Bier- It’s about getting your life back on track.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Marseilles Illinois

Accidents at construction sites can have serious repercussions – leading to severe injuries, permanent disability, or even loss of life. At Carlson Bier, we understand the hazards that come with working in the construction industry. With a diverse professional background at our disposal in Illinois state laws and personal injury litigation, we are equipped to provide exceptional legal representation for victims involved in construction site accidents.

Construction site accidents often result from many causes, such as negligence on behalf of the site owner or contractor, faulty equipment, or lack of necessary safety precautions. Our team is adept at identifying these key areas:

– Failure to enforce safety protocols

– Lack of proper site inspections

– Inadequate training of workers

– Faulty scaffolding or machinery

We strongly advocate for total adherence to federal and state safety regulations amongst our clients’ employers. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sets forth crucial standards aimed at reducing construction-related injuries – any deviation from these set rules can significantly increase risks factors on-site.

Perhaps you may not be familiar with all your rights under Illinois law after suffering an accident on a construction site. Carlson Bier is determined to empower you through comprehensive legal advice tailored uniquely to your case circumstances. Our approach zeroes directly into vital legal details which include:

– Determining liability: Identifying who holds responsibility for your injuries whether it’s the employer, equipment manufacturer or other party.

— Workers’ compensation: Assessing the potential benefits available under this provision following your injury.

– Personal Injury Lawsuits: Exploring possibilities beyond worker’s compensation claims if third parties contributed to your mishap.

A detailed understanding of these critical subject points enables us to develop impactful litigation strategies; positioning ourselves as a tireless/outspoken advocate towards securing fair settlements for our clients.

While located outside Marseilles but certified within Illinois jurisdiction, Carlson Bier remains committed to fully embracing all deserving cases irrespective location boundaries within the State’s precincts; ensuring each one receives the thoughtful attention they are due.

It is common in such accident cases for victims to grapple with mounting medical bills and wage losses. We strongly believe that you should not bear these costs if your accident arose from someone else’s negligence. Our main concern at Carlson Bier extends beyond proving liability – we’re also keen on demonstrating a clear link between your injuries and any financial distress experienced; leading to maximized compensation in lieu of accident-related expenses and other lasting effects.

Navigating through an environment of intricate insurance policy stipulations often poses a daunting challenge for construction site accident victims. Sound guidance from our seasoned attorneys will help translate complex provisions into understandable content, enhancing your chances of benefiting from any existing coverages relative to your situation.

Your claim’s success significantly depends upon swiftly collecting all relevant evidence immediately following the accident. Therefore, working along with us soonest possible impacts vital aspects such as professional investigations, witness statements gathering, preserving photos/videos if any – solidifying proof prerequisites guaranteeing greater outcomes towards fair compensation measures under Illinois law.

This profound journey requires strong companionship – be assured that Carlson Bier is dedicated to standing by you right till the end, tirelessly advocating for justice where it’s due! Please click the button below now if you or a loved one have been affected by a construction site accident in Illinois. Let’s estimate together how much worth lies within your case as we commit ourselves towards securing optimal compensation guided by vast legal expertise exclusively at your disposal.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Marseilles Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Marseilles

Areas of Practice in Marseilles

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Supplying specialist legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Ensuring expert legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal help to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Slip Occurrences

Professional in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Focused on supporting victims of car accidents receive reasonable settlement for harms and damages.

Scooter Accidents

Committed to providing legal services for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Crash

Providing specialist legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for damages.

Construction Incidents

Focused on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Head Traumas

Specializing in ensuring compassionate legal assistance for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Expertise in managing cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal support to ensure restitution.

Backbone Harm

Dedicated to representing clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440