FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Monmouth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Facing a products liability issue in Monmouth? Carlson Bier, with its team of highly skilled lawyers, are fully equipped to handle your case. We understand that such cases can be complex and burdensome – requiring an extensive understanding of the law as well as detailed analysis and preparation. Hence, we strive for excellence through meticulous attention to detail and unwavering determination to fight for our clients. When it comes to defending you against unjust product liabilities, trust us at Carlson Bier. Our mission is not only about providing legal representation; we passionately advocate for your rights while navigating these intricate issues together with you. Your peace of mind matters greatly to us; hence we commit ourselves relentlessly towards securing justice on your behalf. If you demand steadfast dedication from your Products Liability attorney combined with expert guidance throughout every step of the process then consider partnering with Carlson Bier – dedicated defenders of justice in Illinois who sincerely care about helping individuals just like you.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Monmouth Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted and dedicated Illinois-based personal injury lawyers specializing in Products Liability cases. Our expert legal team is fully committed to helping victims who’ve been injured due to faulty or defective products, delivering assertive representation and pursuing maximum compensation on behalf of our clients.

Products Liability law involves holding manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, and retailers liable for injuries caused by defective or dangerous products. The complexity surrounding such cases underscores the need for experienced litigators like us at Carlson Bier. We understand how catastrophic these circumstances can be- from medical bills piling up to losses attributed to time off work – we stand ready to fight tooth and nail for your rights.

Four key aspects shape Product Liability laws: Negligence must be proven against the defendant; Breach of Warranty where explicit or implicit guarantees are broken; Misrepresentation which includes false advertising or failure of necessary warnings; Strict liability where defendants may be held responsible regardless of fault distribution. Each case varies greatly thus requiring a tailored approach towards seeking justice – this is precisely what we specialize in.

Our experience spans a vast array of product-related injuries including but not limited to pharmaceutical drugs, consumer electronics, children’s toys, cars and automotive parts along with other household items. At Carlson Bier,

• We believe that no one should suffer because a manufacturer failed to take precautions.

• Every case matters – large or small.

• Your interest is our primary concern.

• We have an impressive track record in winning favorable settlements

• Our attorneys are fierce advocates in the courtrooms when settlement isn’t an option.

Let’s delve deeper into how we tackle Products Liability claims:

Detailed Investigation: Any efficient claim process begins with thorough research elevating its validity. Our team meticulously studies every facet related not only to individual specific situations but also broader industry practices thereby formulating strategic game plans devised around maximising restitution for you.

Expert Consultations: By partnering with renowned experts across various fields (medical, product design, etc.), we substantiate your case further adding substantial weight to the claims and thereby increasing chances of a successful pursuit.

Trial Readiness: Our team is always prepared for litigation and doesn’t shy away from going to trial if it best serves our clients’ needs. We equip ourselves with strong evidence supporting your claim.

Continued Support: Understanding the emotional instances experienced by victims in these situations is paramount to us. We offer empathy and clarity throughout the process ensuring that you are aware of each step taken.

At Carlson Bier, we work on a contingent fee basis; this means until we win or settle your case, you owe us nothing. It’s our commitment built firmly into our system letting you know that when we say “we’re here for you”, we mean it every step of the way without any underlying burden on your side.

To gauge the potential value of your Products Liability case, why not take advantage of our no-obligation consultation right away? The limitations period can be relatively short in some cases hence don’t delay – Your claim’s worth might pleasantly surprise you! Click on the button below to find out exactly how much YOUR Product Liability Case could be worth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Monmouth Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Monmouth

Areas of Practice in Monmouth

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Scald Burns

Offering professional legal advice for victims of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Medical Carelessness

Extending expert legal representation for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving faulty products, supplying skilled legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Neglect

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Tumble Occurrences

Skilled in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Childbirth Wounds

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to guiding patients of car accidents gain fair compensation for injuries and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Specializing in providing representation for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing experienced legal advice for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Committed to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Harms

Committed to offering expert legal assistance for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Expertise in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Passing

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and professional legal services to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on defending patients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440