FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in New Athens

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a products liability issue in New Athens, Illinois, Carlson Bier is the optimal choice. Renowned for their exceptional expertise and proven track record within this complicated legal sphere, they skillfully navigate complex cases related to product defects or malfunction. This advanced proficiency stems from the team’s comprehensive understanding of specific laws governing every facet of Products Liability, ensuring your case is handled impeccably. Their fierce commitment to seeking justice and securing favorable results has built trusted rapport amid clients needing proficient representation on products liability claims. At Carlson Bier, unrivaled client service ensures handling each case genuinely and attentively while respecting individual experiences connected with defective products’ adversities—their success underlines their excellence as premier lawyers excelling in Products Liability Law cases—thoroughly assessing all available options optimizes compensation opportunities for affected individuals. Choose Carlson Bier; opt for professionals who possess immense capability masters at transforming intimidating legal challenges into manageable solutions efficiently and effectively.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in New Athens Illinois

Expertise, experience, and empathy are the cornerstones of Carlson Bier’s practice. As a premier personal injury attorney group in Illinois, we specialize in handling cases related to products liability, among other areas. Products liability refers to the responsibility held by suppliers or manufacturers for injuries caused by defective or dangerous products that they sell or produce.

When it comes to safeguarding your rights as a consumer, understanding what constitutes a product liabilities case is crucial. Cases can involve all types of goods from automobiles and appliances to medications and children’s toys—anything that has inherent defects causing harm may be grounds for litigation. There are three predominant categories where claims typically come under – design defects, manufacturing defects, and lack of adequate warnings or instructions.

Design defects exist even before the product is made — these relate to poor planning or inherently dangerous designs which make the product unsafe for usage despite perfect production.

Manufacturing defects pertain when a fault transpires during the assembly process leading to an unsafe final product.

Lack of sufficient warnings outlines situations wherein products could be hazardous without proper guidance or noticeable indicators about its potential hazards.

At our firm Carlson Bier, you will find trusted partners who understand not just the laws governing these cases but also how deeply such experiences can impact lives. Our lawyer-client relationships are built on trust and compassion—we take time getting to know every client as well as their individual situations because we believe this enables effective representation

We handle each step thoroughly so you don’t have to worry about anything else aside from healing and recovery—from investigating every detail surrounding your case; collaborating with industry experts if needed; preparing convincing arguments substantiated with factual evidence; representing you in court—all geared towards securing full compensation for all damages suffered.

• We assess claim merits—determining if there exists legitimate ground for filing a lawsuit

• Pre-trial preparation—it involves interviewing witnesses, gathering pertinent documents (medical records), discovery phase proceedings

• Negotiation—often cases can be settled outside court, which greatly reduces stress on our clients. We ensure no stone is left unturned in securing a fair settlement

• Trial representation—if the case does go to trial, we fight stoutly for your rights and make sure the jury fully comprehends your ordeal.

Carlson Bier operates strictly under Illinois law fundamentals reminding residents about legalities tied to attorney advertising. As such, it’s pivotal for you to know that while we are committed to represent personal injury victims across the state, any insinuation of offices outside our actual physical locations is neither made nor possession thereof claimed.

Your trust and confidence in us matter greatly. To help curtail some uncertainties riddling tort litigations especially around products liability claims, Carlson Bier offers online resources detailing every facet of this complex legal subject allowing potential claimants grasp everything about products liability suits—what they are; what is involved; who can sue (or be sued); possible damages recoverable—the entire nine yards!

Have you or a loved one been injured due to an unsafe product? Whether you’re just starting out or have hit a roadblock in your case, don’t despair. Reach out today to learn how Carlson Bier may assist with securing compensation for medical bills caused by defective or hazardous goods usage among other damages sufferance related thereto.. Click on the button below for a free evaluation of your case and find out what it could potentially be worth. Dedication and determination underscore everything we do—we strive relentlessly towards achieving justice for victims of Products Liability offences so let’s embark this journey together with Carlson Bier on your side!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For New Athens Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in New Athens

Areas of Practice in New Athens

Bike Collisions

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Providing expert legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal support for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Handling cases involving defective products, offering adept legal support to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Slip Accidents

Skilled in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Traumas

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Collisions: Devoted to aiding individuals of car accidents obtain appropriate payout for harms and destruction.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal advice for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Crash

Offering professional legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Neurological Damages

Focused on providing dedicated legal support for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Skilled in handling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Expert in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in representing victims with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440