FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in River Forest

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with life-altering Spinal Cord Injuries, you need a devoted champion by your side — that’s where Carlson Bier comes in. Our expertise springs from years of refining our practice around personal injury law, particularly focusing on spinal cord injuries. Offering more than just legal advice, we deliver optimal personalized strategies fueled by a profound understanding of Illinois’ specific laws and regulations.

We realize the devastation misplaced actions can incur; we strive tirelessly to secure justice for you alongside just compensation. As chosen advisors across River Forest, it is our duty at Carlson Bier to meticulously build compelling cases based on factual evidence and expert testimonies.

Trusted implicitly for maintaining an exemplary success rate, choosing us means opting for unparalleled competency and sheer commitment. We leave no stone unturned when advocating your rights against insurance companies or liable entities.

Residing in uncertainties after suffering spinal cord trauma? Let us eliminate them for you – providing clarity amidst the chaos has always been integral towards achieving triumphs at Carlson Biers’. Reach out today: because we don’t rest until justice prevails.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in River Forest Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, widely recognized as one of Illinois’ premier personal injury law firms specializing in Spinal Cord Injuries. With several decades of legal experience under our belt, we are dedicated to assuring that victims of tragic spinal cord injuries receive the justice they deserve and the compensation they need.

Spinal cord injuries can drastically alter a person’s life in seconds due to sudden trauma or severe blow, leaving them physically impaired while leading to emotional distress as well. These injuries may result from motor vehicle accidents, slip-and-fall incidents, sports-related accidents, violence-associated incidents among other scenarios. While some victims experience partial loss of motor control known as ‘incomplete spinal cord injury,’, others endure a total loss which usually results in paralysis also referred to as ‘complete spinal cord injury.’

Carlson Bier deeply understands the gravity of spinal cord injury cases and their impact not only on an individual’s health but how they dramatically disrupt vital aspects of your life including work and family responsibilities. Hence, financial damages obtained through litigation often play a crucial role in ongoing medical treatment support, home modifications for accessibility accommodations and maintaining overall quality-resource living standards.

• Legal Challenges: Often times insurance companies adopt delaying tactics making it hard for you to get compensated promptly or by offering unusually low settlements which aren’t just. That is where there is substantial need for hiring professional personal injury lawyers like us who understand these maneuvers too well.

• Compensation: Victims suffering with spinal cord injuries are entitled various forms damage claims like present and future medical expenses; lost wages; reduction in earning capacity; pain and suffering; lifestyle changes; emotional distress amongst others.

Further emphasizing on the understanding part:

• Medical Understanding: It’s essential for your attorneys be conversant with specific medical terminologies pertaining your case enabling better interpretation of medical records- translating into stronger case evidence adducing.

• Financial Understanding: The legal team at Carlson Bier will help quantify all related financial losses- present or future ensuring proper valuing of your claims broadly diversified and long-lasting as they may be.

The Carlson Bier ethos is simple; we tirelessly fight for the rights of our clients till a successful resolution is accomplished. Our team follows an aggressive but ethical approach towards insurance companies, defending your rights fiercely yet professionally for fair compensation delivery.

Even more assuringly, you don’t have to worry about upfront attorney fee payment at Carlson Bier. We operate on contingency basis which basically means no fee is charged until the case successfully compensates you in other words “no win no fee”.

Now that you are better informed about spinal cord injuries and their associated legal challenges, wouldn’t you lean towards partnering with a firm possessing such extensive experience and robust commitment like ours? It’s simply because we understand just how much rests on these cases financially and emotionally.

Hence, if you’ve suffered from a debilitating spinal cord injury due to another party’s negligence, time is of essence. Reach out to us without any delay so we can immediately start working on your case providing personal attention it needs building towards its victory.

But how do you take action beyond this step? Simply locate the button below marked “Find Out How Much Your Case Is Worth” and click on it right away! Not only will doing this enable comprehensive evaluation of your unfortunate predicament’s legal merit, but thereby letting us chart forward course swiftly towards claim settlement serving justice rightfully as per Illinois state law where we passionately practice.

⁣

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For River Forest Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in River Forest

Areas of Practice in River Forest

Bicycle Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Burns

Extending expert legal services for victims of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Extending specialist legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, providing skilled legal guidance to consumers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Slip Accidents

Specialist in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Extending legal support for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate settlement for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Incidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring adept legal assistance for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for hurts.

Building Mishaps

Concentrated on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to ensuring specialized legal advice for patients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Expert in defending individuals with spine impairments, offering professional legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440